SPECIES LIVING IN THE SAME AGE AS THEIR ANCESTORS

In order to prove their theory the evolutionists tried to make a chronological tree of the human. So by logic it should go like this: australopithecusà Homo habilisà Homo erectusà neanderthaler and Homo sapiens. Such chronological row does not exist! Australopithecus lived 4 million years ago and all till 2 million. Homo habilis lived 1,7-1,9 million years ago. What is here strange  is the fact that Homo rudolfensis (who is more advanced than Homo habilis) lived 2,5-2,8 million years ago! That means that Homo rudolfensis is older than his ancestor for about a million years. Carzy! As to Homo erectus, who is considered to have lived before 2,0-1,2 million years, we have to mention that by some logic he lived in the same period as his ancestors. Alan Walker said that there was a small group of species that appeared in the same period, in which their ancestors lived. Louis Leakey found fossils of australopithecus, Homo habilis and erectus one by another. Stephen Jay Gould from Harward University admits that none of the fossils can precisely define the era, in which these creatures lived. When we look at Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, we clearly see that there doesn't exist any chronological tree, which would clearly define that Homo sapiens was »developed« from Homo erectus.

The secrets of Homo sapiens

This chapter is a finnal crush of the chronological tree. We all know that scientist claim that man appeared 95.000 years ago, but what do the evidence show!? I will mention three events and in a few words describe »how they shook the public« and »what was the response«.

1. In 1932 around the Victoria lake in Kenya Lous Leakey discovered several fossils, which were from the middle Pleistocene. We are talking about a period 1 million years ago. This fact ruined the whole idea of the »human tree« and so evolutionists rejected the proof, although Leakey constantly claimed that his estimations were correct.

2. Spain 1995 three Spanish students from Madrid  discovered a fossil, which belonged to a 11 year-old boy. The fossil was 800.000 years old and completely equal as the human's today. This fossil is a clear proof that Homo Sapiens appeared before 800.000, but the evolutionists had a new theory and so they made up a new class »Homo antecessor«.

3. In 1977 Mary Leakey found a foorprint in Tanzania, which belonged to a Homo sapiens and his oldness was 3,6 million years. These prints were examined by several people and they always showed the same thing that this was a print of a Homo sapiens. Scientists like Don Johanson, Tim White and Lous Robbins clearly stated that this was a Homo sapiens print. Russel Tuttle said: »They could have been made by a smal barefoot Homo sapiens…« In the 90's evolutionists claimed (very badly) that this is a australopithecus' print, because it would be impossible that Homo sapiens is 3,6 million years old!! So Russel H. Tuttle changed his mind and stated that this is a print of the Lucy species.

This is a clear picture od the »evolutionist's theory«.

Alim Hasanagic

to be continued...