|
THEORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION - part 4 (1.8.2007)
What is logical in the 4th part?
In order to prove their theory the
evolutionists tried to make a chronological tree of the human.
So by logic it should go like this: australopithecusà
Homo habilisà Homo
erectusà
neanderthaler and Homo sapiens. Such chronological row does not
exist...(READ
MORE)
THEORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION - part 3 (26.4.2007)
This is the 3rd part of the theory of human
evolution. It talks about Homo erectus and the neanderthaler.
Are these really "under-species" or are they normal homo-sapienses?
(READ)
THEORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION - part 2
(20.3.2007)
Our report continues. Our readers know that we are busy and
because of that we couldn't focus on publishing the theory of evolution. Alim:
"I'm sorry because I couldn't publish my 2nd part of evolution like it was said
(in some days) at the beginning. I had to translate other articles (in english)
so I ran out of time." Our today's subject is Australopithecus and Homo habilis.
Enjoy and find out the truth of the theory.
(READ)
THEORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION - part 1
(3.3.2007)
Every 3 or 4 days we will post the next part of the discussion.
Have you ever wondered that the theory has some mistakes? Have you asked
yourself why God talks to us about Adam and Eve, if there is this theory, which
proves that the "holy story" is wrong? What is the truth? It's our job to
present it. Here are some basics about the HUMAN theory.
(READ)
| 
